Bridgette Hamstead

 

Much of the dominant narrative around autism focuses on what is presumed to be missing. Autistic people are often described as lacking empathy, emotional insight, or the ability to read a room. These assumptions are deeply rooted in deficit-based models of neurodevelopment, and they ignore the very real and complex ways that many autistic people move through the world. In particular, one area that is consistently overlooked, dismissed, or misinterpreted is autistic intuition. It is time to radically reframe the way we understand autistic perception, pattern recognition, and gut knowing not as social deficits or cognitive distortions, but as a legitimate and embodied form of intelligence.

Autistic people are frequently told that we misunderstand social cues or misread emotional signals, yet many of us have spent our lives noticing everything. We pick up subtle shifts in body language, tone of voice, energy, and rhythm that others seem to miss entirely. We may not interpret those shifts in the way that neurotypical people expect, but that does not mean we are wrong. It means we are reading a different layer of information, often one that is closer to truth than performance. Autistic people are often highly attuned to emotional undercurrents and inconsistencies, especially when someone’s words do not match their tone or behavior. We may not always be able to articulate exactly what feels off in the moment, but we know. We feel it in our bodies. And we remember.

This kind of perception is not limited to interpersonal dynamics. Autistic intuition also shows up in pattern recognition, systems thinking, and sensory awareness. Many autistic people can spot discrepancies, repetitions, or emerging patterns long before others do. We notice when routines shift, when systems stop making sense, or when an unspoken rule is being broken. This skill is often framed as obsessive or overly rigid, but in reality, it is a form of deep attunement. It allows us to anticipate problems, identify trends, or sense when something is about to go wrong. For those of us who have spent our lives masking or navigating unpredictable environments, this hyper-awareness can become a survival skill. Over time, it becomes internalized as intuition.

Unfortunately, this kind of autistic knowing is often dismissed by neurotypical systems. When we speak up about something we sense, we are told we are overreacting or being difficult. If we name a discomfort that others have not yet identified, we are labeled as sensitive or paranoid. If we say that something feels off, we are told to be more flexible or go with the flow. This dismissal is especially common in professional settings, where intuition is only valued when it conforms to neurotypical norms. Gut instincts from neurotypical leaders are framed as leadership or innovation, while the same insights from autistic people are framed as disruptive or confusing.

This erasure can be particularly damaging for late-diagnosed autistic adults. Many of us grew up internalizing the belief that our instincts could not be trusted. We were told we were too intense, too reactive, too analytical. We learned to doubt ourselves, to defer to others, to assume we were always wrong. This conditioning makes it difficult to distinguish between anxiety and intuition, especially when our nervous systems have been pushed into chronic hypervigilance. But even amid that confusion, many of us are rediscovering that our knowing was never the problem. The problem was that no one listened.

Reclaiming autistic intuition is a powerful act of self-trust. It means noticing when something in our body tightens or pulls away, and believing that it matters. It means acknowledging when a conversation feels emotionally unsafe, even if no one else sees it that way. It means recognizing that our way of understanding the world through patterns, rhythms, emotional resonance, and energetic shifts is not only valid, but often deeply insightful. Autistic people have a way of seeing that is not linear or shallow. It is layered, embodied, and intuitive. We may not explain it the same way others do, but we know what we know.

There is also a long history of autistic people being gaslit or pathologized when they speak up about what they sense. This is particularly true for autistic women, nonbinary people, and other marginalized genders, whose perceptions are already devalued within patriarchal systems. When we say that someone is not safe, or that a situation feels wrong, we are often told to stop being dramatic or to give people the benefit of the doubt. But this tendency to override our intuition is not harmless. It trains us to betray our own signals. It distances us from our bodies. And it leaves us more vulnerable to harm.

In truth, the very traits that are often framed as deficits in autistic people sensitivity, attunement, pattern recognition, deep emotional processing are the building blocks of intuition. What neurotypical systems label as awkwardness or reactivity is often the surface expression of an inner landscape that is moving rapidly, deeply, and intelligently. Our responses may not look typical, but they are rooted in real perception. And when we learn to listen to ourselves, when we stop filtering our instincts through a lens of self-doubt, we often find that we were right all along.

To take autistic intuition seriously, we must first stop dismissing it. We must unlearn the bias that equates intuition with confidence, social fluency, or charm. Autistic people know things through sensation, observation, and embodied memory. We notice what others overlook. We feel what others suppress. We name what others avoid. And that kind of knowing deserves respect. The more we listen to autistic people, the more we make space for different ways of sensing, interpreting, and responding to the world. Trusting autistic intuition means expanding our collective definition of intelligence and honoring forms of insight that have been silenced for too long. If we want real inclusion, we must start by believing that autistic ways of knowing are not broken. They are valuable. They are real.

Previous
Previous

Disordered or Disabled or Neither: Questioning the Pathologizing Language of Diagnosis

Next
Next

Inclusion Shouldn’t Hurt: When DEI Work Is Just More Labor for Marginalized People