The Blog
When Inclusion Is Just Another Word for Control
This article critiques how many so-called inclusion efforts are actually systems of control that require autistic people to conform to neurotypical norms in order to be accepted. It explores how schools, workplaces, and therapeutic settings often use the language of care while enforcing compliance and masking, rather than creating accessible environments. True inclusion, the article argues, must center autonomy, access, and systemic change, not performance or assimilation.
The Dangerous Ableism in ‘Early Intervention’ and Why It’s Not What Autistic Kids Need
Early intervention for autistic children is often framed as necessary for their success, but in reality, it is rooted in ableist assumptions that prioritize making children appear less autistic rather than supporting their natural development. Many intervention programs focus on compliance-based training, teaching children to suppress their natural behaviors instead of creating environments that accommodate their needs, leading to long-term harm, including masking, anxiety, and loss of self-trust. Instead of forcing autistic children to conform to neurotypical expectations, true support should center on affirming their neurodivergence, providing accommodations, and fostering environments that allow them to thrive as they are.
How Schools Teach Neurodivergent Kids to Hate Themselves (And How We Can Stop It)
The education system teaches neurodivergent children to hate themselves by forcing them to conform to neurotypical expectations, punishing them for their natural behaviors, and prioritizing compliance over real learning. Autistic and ADHD students are frequently misunderstood, disciplined for traits they cannot control, and made to feel like they are broken rather than supported in ways that align with their needs. To stop this cycle of harm, schools must adopt flexible, inclusive approaches that recognize neurodivergent strengths, provide necessary accommodations, and shift from punishment-based models to supportive, trauma-informed education.
Why So Many Autistic Women Were in Gifted Programs—And What That Means
Many late-diagnosed autistic women look back on their childhoods and recognize that being labeled as gifted was often a way their autism was overlooked. Instead of being identified as neurodivergent, their intelligence and deep interests were praised, while their struggles with social interactions, sensory sensitivities, and executive function were ignored. This pattern reveals systemic failures in autism recognition, highlighting the need for better understanding, support, and accommodations for neurodivergent children who are both gifted and autistic.